Ed,
I think you would agree, though, that they definitely sought to prioritize their experiments given the small product available for testing. You better than me, could lay your hands on the quote by the keeper of the product, that it pained him to give up a little more, as there was so little left.
I think you would agree, though, that they definitely sought to prioritize their experiments given the small product available for testing. You better than me, could lay your hands on the quote by the keeper of the product, that it pained him to give up a little more, as there was so little left.
I agree, and I assume that they did prioritize their experiments. The problem is that a lot of experiments require that the tiny sample be destroyed in one way or another, and often a single test is insufficient for a scientific finding. So, they have to destroy tiny sample after tiny sample. (That doesn't mean there are debates over the findings, it just means that often many tests are required to make sure there will be no debates in court.)