What you protest is Specter's 'Magic Bullet Theory'.
If you say that it didn't happen that way, then there's another shooter and at least one more bullet, isn't there?
So, where is this extra bullet and extra shooter? If you believe that the shots all came from the TSBD, then did Oswald hand C2766 to 'Mystery Shooter X' so that they could take a turn?
That's what I mean when I say that you just say 'Nope, nope. Didn't happen that way. Specter's a crook.' and consider yourself satisfied that you've answered the question.
Account for the way the assassination really happened, please. If all you can say is 'I don't know for sure, and neither do you', then we're done ever discussing this again with one another, aren't we?
The Government locked up 10,000 files and pieces of evidence for 75 years (until 2036 now); it isn’t for lack of wanting to know the exact sequence of the assassination as for me.
The debated dictabelt tape analysis has been said to confirm 4 shots.
http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/hscaacous.htm
The facts provided by Zapruder's camera, and its speed, are crucial to your single bullet theory. Your theory doesn't fit those facts. Case open.
Three spent cartridges found in the sniper's nest. Evidence proves that the material in Kennedy's head is located entirely in the right side of his cranium. Particle analysis shows that the fragments came from the same bullets and same rifle. Oswald was a creepy left wing loser who had priors and present reasoning for motive. That's my position.
Yep.
What you protest is Specter's 'Magic Bullet Theory'.
You bet.
If you say that it didn't happen that way, then there's another shooter and at least one more bullet, isn't there? So, where is this extra bullet and extra shooter?
You tell me. - The Commission couldn't, and neither can any of you true believers.
If you believe that the shots all came from the TSBD, then did Oswald hand C2766 to 'Mystery Shooter X' so that they could take a turn?
You tell me. - The Commission couldn't, and neither can any of you SBT true believers.
That's what you never address, won't provide an answer for, and I don't believe that you will address it now.
How weird. you cited this post of mine from a month ago:
You know what? Never mind all that. Just tell us where your magic bullet is. That one that killed Kennedy that Oswald didn't fire.
I'm not disputing that the last bullet fired could have come from the depository. Or that Oswald could have fired it. -- Never have.
Where. Is. Your. Extra. Bullet? Answer. The. Question.
I 'have' an extra bullet? Where did you get that idea? From Specter?
-- His theory sure lacks something, I'll grant you fellas that.
211 posted on 06/05/2007 9:09:10 AM PDT by tpaine
That's what I mean when I say that you just say 'Nope, nope. Didn't happen that way. Specter's a crook.' and consider yourself satisfied that you've answered the question. Account for the way the assassination really happened, please.
I don't know, and neither do you or the Warren Commission .
If all you can say is 'I don't know for sure, and neither do you', then we're done ever discussing this again with one another, aren't we?
Suit yourself, but I doubt that you will stop insisting the single bullet theory proves 'case closed'.
I say it has flaws, and I will continue to say so.
If you can't discuss/counter the facts/issues I raise, feel free to ignore those facts.
- Which is essentially what you fellas did at the end of last months thread, cited above. -- Apparently, it's all y'all can do.