Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oldenuff2no
Okay, then. What's the evidence that leads you to believe the probability of a second shooter existed if you agree that the time mechanics of the shooting allow Oswald to overwhelmingly accomplish the feat?

You propose an entirely new mutation of the JFK conspiracy theory, as far as I'm aware. I'll need you to lay it out for me.

490 posted on 07/04/2007 2:06:09 PM PDT by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid

Probably about every theory has been proposed, the nitrate (paraffin) testing, did show that on his hands; but none on his cheek, leading many to say, LHO did not fire a rifle.

(This website looks left leaning, but it is just this issue I am looking for of which I read this)

“In addition, Oswald provably didn’t fire a rifle that day. His cheek was tested for nitrates and came up negative.” - http://realhistoryarchives.blogspot.com/2007/06/reclaiming-history-from-bugliosi-again.html


494 posted on 07/04/2007 2:25:37 PM PDT by RGPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson