[Mr. K]

I’m with you... one look at the Zapruder film and it is obvious the head shot cam from right front, and no one will convince me otherwise.

Oh, and I have a degree in Physics.

The Zapruder film shows more than 3 shots if you know what to look for.

Plus the one that missed and hit a man under the overpass.

Plus the one that missed everyone and hit a curb (they actually removed the portion of the curb)

[blasater1960]

"one look at the Zapruder film and it is obvious the head shot cam from right front, and no one will convince me otherwise."

Yeah, plus Jackie scrambling out on the trunk to grab his skull? On every forensic show I have seen the bullet makes a smaller entry wound and then blows out the other side. Conolly should have had skull on him not the trunk?

[News Junkie]

I’ve followed this for at least 30 years now. Always thought the same as you about the head shot.

However, I found Mark Furhman’s book “A Simple Act of Murder” to be highly compelling. He approached it from the perspective of a homicide detective arriving at the scene. He concluded Oswald acted alone.

The key to his theory is a rebuttal of the Warren Commission’s finding, quoted in the original story above, that the second shot missed.

Furhman nails it: 3 shots, 3 hits. Shot one, Kennedy’s neck. Shot 2, Connally’s wounds. Shot 3, Kennedy head shot. All Oswald.

He had experts fire the weapon, and they could do it in time.

This article from the UK is off track, bigtime.

I encourage everyone to read Furhman’s excellent book. He make it very simple and clears it all up, for me anyway.

[cmiller623]

Yes to what you say. But those that believe there were more gunman there believe the evidence shows it. The others don’t want too believe it. What about the guy with the umbrella opening it as a marker to start shooting. So many things didn’t add up that day. How about Johnson’s executive order to push more troops to Viet Nam. Arlen Spector was the lawyer for the Warren Commission. Gerald Ford handled the FBI and all these guys got paid back in spades. Coincidences? No.

[ExGeeEye]

1. The large wound on JFK's right front was large exit wound enlarged by hydrostatic overpressure in the cranial cavity. The crated enrty wound was not in line-of-sight from the right front. 2. The one that hit the curb is the one that hit the man under the overpass. Actually he was hit by a ricocheting fragment as the bullet shattered on hitting the curb, which is why he suffered a small cut rather than a puncture wound.

[Reaganwuzthebest]

Oswald was a shooter or at least an accomplice on the sixth floor and what I consider to be hard photographic evidence of him at the window proves it imo. But I agree with you about a possible second gunman and it’s mainly because of not only the Zapruder film but the eyewitness account of Ed Hoffman, whom I consider to be a credible witness. Long before the Moorman photo was blown up to reveal badgeman he claimed to have seen someone dressed in a police uniform fire a gun behind the fence along with a railroad man who assisted him and who’s also seen in the picture. It gave credibility to his story.