Posted on 06/29/2007 7:48:12 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Former Sen. Fred Thompson (R-Tenn.) may be violating Federal Election Commission (FEC) laws by failing to report funds raised in the second quarter, which ends tomorrow giving his probable presidential campaign a one-month fundraising advantage over his rivals in the third quarter.
Republican or Democratic rivals could file a complaint against Thompson if he enters the 2008 presidential race and it becomes apparent that he spent the month of June campaigning rather than wrestling with the decision to run.
Thompson is operating under the testing the waters clause of FEC laws, allowing him to raise money, travel and conduct polling to determine whether a bid is feasible. If he were to start campaigning, he officially would become a candidate, subject to filing requirements.
The law, however, is vague when it comes to the difference between testing the waters and all-out campaigning.
Those testing the waters are forbidden from referring to themselves as candidates, advertising or trying to get on a ballot.
Perhaps more importantly, the laws forbid such a person from rais[ing] more money than what is reasonably needed to test the waters or amass funds (seed money) to be used after candidacy is established.
Thompson attended at least one $2,300 fundraiser in Nashville this week, and as The Hill reported earlier this month, 100 of his supporters were asked to raise a total of about $4.7 million.
The Hill reported last week that Thompson has hired a Midwest/Northeast finance director, a move that could be seen as indicating he has made up his mind.
Thompson has been careful to say publicly that he is testing the waters, adding in Tennessee that those waters are pretty warm, according to reports.
And his campaign website is paid for by Friends of Fred, Inc. instead of something like Fred 2008 or Thompson for President.
One cant help but see that Thompson again might be hearing the call to serve, the website reads. As he discussed less than six months ago, a door is opening and this time Fred Dalton Thompson may lead all of America through it.
One Republican strategist and attorney said Thompson has been amassing a lot of money, hiring staff and traveling to primary states all of which is indicative of an ongoing campaign, not deciding whether or not to run.
The operative added that Thompsons actions of the last month are inconsistent with the testing-the-waters phase and more like a candidate.
A spokeswoman for the watchdog group Common Cause said, If he intends to run he ought to just announce and get it over with, adding that Thompson is being coy and not adhering to the spirit of the testing-the-waters phase.
While Thompson and his small staff have been careful about the way they describe the former senators actions, his supporters have not.
Tennessee Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey (R) was quoted this week referring to Thompson as the only conservative candidate.
Thompson spokesman Mark Corallo took issue with anonymous critics, but said such complaints are wholly without merit.
All of the Thompson testing-the-waters committee activities have been and continue to be performed pursuant to these regulations which have been on the books for decades, Corallo said in an e-mail. I suppose those legal ignoramuses (or is it ignorami?) forgot to check the rules. They could have made a quick call to the [former New York City Mayor Rudy] Giuliani campaign which started out as a testing-the-waters committee this cycle.
Indeed, most of the current campaigns started out with testing-the-waters phases or exploratory committees. Some continue to operate under the latter distinction, but they are required to report their fundraising totals.
If or when Thompson decides to get into the race officially, rival campaigns or citizens can file a complaint with the FEC, which would investigate whether or not Thompson was spending this time campaigning instead of testing the waters.
The complaint would have precedent. The FEC found evangelist Pat Robertson guilty of such an infraction in the 1988 race and required he pay a $25,000 fine. But the decision was made after the election was over.
Because of the lengthy process involved and the size of the fine, which is paltry compared to the lofty sums most campaigns are raising now, Thompson may not face much trouble if he were accused of skirting the law.
I think the deterrent, frankly, is him being called on it, a Republican strategist said.
I wonder why. Is it perhaps because he will wipe the floor with them, before it's all over?
Tennessee Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey (R) was quoted this week referring to Thompson as the only conservative candidate.
The only conservative that has a serious chance to garner the majority of Republican votes for the primary. Hunter is a tad more conservative.
Even right here on Free Republic.
FEAR THE FRED!!!!
Ya know it’s kinda funny. Pointing to facts in Fred Thompsons record are called attacks yet here you are calling names.
Bit more drama, we ARE dealing with an actor here....
I smell.....
FEAR!
Exactly. When you start getting flak, you know you're over the target.
Please illuminate me as to what names I called you.
Look at your title.
Tennessee Lt. Gov. Ron Ramsey (R) was quoted this week referring to Thompson as the only conservative candidate.
Campaign finance laws really stink.
Low profile, get the message.
You have not attacked anyone on this thread, so I don’t think he was referring to you.
Low profile, get the message out. :)
Give Mitt a few months. He may decide that this conservative thing isn’t working out so well and try something else.
What is it that you think that means?
I’ve asked this question on several Fred threads and have yet to get an answer. Does Fred Thompson support the deportation of, or amnesty for illegal aliens?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.