Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWhale

The futurist, Alvin Topfler, claims in a recent book that if we were to send the space shuttle to the moon, we could load it with enough helium to power the USA for a year. Anybody know if that sounds right?


29 posted on 06/29/2007 8:51:05 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: ClaireSolt

The Toflers are not right if they claim that about He3. It is astonishing how these folktales seem to live on long after they are debunked. Tofler is okay, though, even if his Waves are simplistic. Just right for China.


30 posted on 06/29/2007 9:03:02 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: ClaireSolt
“helium to power the USA for a year”

He thinks that there is harvestable He3, and assumes that if we had lots we’d be able to figure out helium fusion (He3 is much more “fusable” than hydrogen or tritium).

He assumes a landing/takeoff system to get a crew or robot down to the moon and back up with the He3.

Other than a dozen more unfounded assumptions, he’s dead on, once we have a fusion power plant burning He3 on Earth, a lunar trip could fuel it if there’s helium-3 available on the moon.

35 posted on 06/29/2007 11:26:02 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson