Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

For the ping list's wild and wacky files.

(Interesting the author didn't postulate how the power would back get to earth)

1 posted on 06/29/2007 5:50:53 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RedStateRocker; Dementon; eraser2005; Calpernia; DTogo; Maelstrom; Yehuda; babble-on; ...
Renewable Energy Ping

Please Freep Mail me if you'd like on/off

2 posted on 06/29/2007 5:51:11 AM PDT by Uncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
(Interesting the author didn't postulate how the power would back get to earth)


3 posted on 06/29/2007 5:53:03 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Microwave transmission. One catch, tho - the beam gets out of alignment with the receiving station, and you get lots of cooked stuff down below. The technology required to operate such an orbital construct is not exactly ‘off the shelf’.


4 posted on 06/29/2007 5:56:38 AM PDT by farlander (Try not to wear milk bone underwear - it's a dog eat dog financial world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

“how the power would back get to earth”

A low power density microwave beam, tuned away from the strong water peaks. The reciever is a large array of small rectifying antennas (rectenna array).

If the beam wanders off, the low power density does not cause (much) damage.

It requires a large rectenna, but if you use a very concentrated beam, the consequences of a beam steering accident goes up. Rectennas are simpler than solar cells and can be worked into building structures.

Ambitious and forward-thinking. We’ve had shuttles for how long now? And what do we do with them?


5 posted on 06/29/2007 6:06:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
Oh NOT this idiocy again.

This SF has been going around since the '70's.

6 posted on 06/29/2007 6:09:26 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KevinDavis

Space ping


13 posted on 06/29/2007 7:03:20 AM PDT by indcons (Please call and thank Sens. Sessions, DeMint, and Vitter. They deserve our praise and gratitude.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
The era of expendable launch vehicles should end and reusable launch vehicles (RLV) are needed Yeah, no joke. If India can pull RLV development off, while we have not, then perhaps the 21st century will be "Asian". I'm not holding my breath.
19 posted on 06/29/2007 7:36:02 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Interesting weapon potential. Reminds me of the reflective beam in Jason and the Argonauts...


20 posted on 06/29/2007 7:39:11 AM PDT by NTW64 (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

This has been possible for 1/4 century. India will not make it pay unless they combine it with two other things:
1. Put energy intensive industry in space;
2. Initiate space mining.

Space mining is effectively prohibited by the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty, which makes the program unfeasible. All this was discussed in detail when the L-5 Society was active long ago. India has had a grassroots interest in space development stronger than any other country, but they haven’t been paying attention.


22 posted on 06/29/2007 7:40:26 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave
I’m missing something here...

The space-based solar panels would be positioned between the Earth and sun so the panels can collect 24/7.

The system would beam the collected energy down to a stationary antenna on the Earth’s surface...

While the Earth is spinning?

23 posted on 06/29/2007 7:43:34 AM PDT by ryan71 (You can hear it on the coconut telegraph...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

I remember reading a few years ago that the receiver on the surface of the earth would have to be huge - 100 miles in diameter. Maybe technology has changed since that was written.


25 posted on 06/29/2007 7:53:14 AM PDT by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Little, tiny parachutes.


31 posted on 06/29/2007 9:13:34 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Uncledave

Cool. Reducing the world’s dependency of oil is a worthy goal. The more different ideas about how to accomplish that goal, the better.


36 posted on 06/29/2007 12:11:07 PM PDT by goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson