How so? By stating the reality that most USN aviators today believe going with the single engine F-35 was a foolish choice? That they don't want to be left out to dry flying mainly over water with one engine (for the sake of costs)....That such a choice rings one's memory of building F-4s sans any guns (because of costs and they wouldn't be needed in the era of the missile).
By telling the reality that A-10s (and 14s until they left the PG) were birds of choice routinely by guys on the ground...
By asserting that the USN would have been better off pushing / demanding for an equivalent F-22 type aircraft to take over AS role...
Nah, you're a prick, looking to argue a point that doesn't exist. Put it back in your pants bud...it's not attractive.
FOAD you ignorant pogue.