Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DevSix
and hell, that isn't even what the 14's were built for!

BS once again. As pictured below the Tomcat was designed as a fleet air defender/bomb hauler from the get go; carrying up to 18 Mk82s if desired. That's one of the major reason why the Marine Corps reluctantly agreed to buy 70 of them, not to help keep the per plane cost down as the Navy wanted. The Navy chose not to utilize the strike capability for a couple of reasons. First they'd have to explain to congress why their expensive FAD platform was being used to haul bombs when they already had much cheaper A-6s, A-7s and F-4s doing that and until it was clear that the Intruder was indeed dead and the Hornet demonstrated that it did not have adequate range for long range strike there was no need.


Image Courtesy of Mike Kern

F-14A prototype with 14 Mk 82 500lb bombs.

91 posted on 06/29/2007 11:32:11 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: A.A. Cunningham
Oh come on - The F-14 was first and foremost a fleet defender / interceptor. That there were prototype A's showing some dumb-bomb dropping capabilities is a long way off from saying it was designed as was/is the F/A 18 series.

Leap-frog ahead 30 years, re-outfit 14's into Bombcats and tell me we (or DOD) expected them to outperform all the updated (sans Fs) 18's.

Give me a break. You are trying to cause an argument where none need exist. Nor do I have time for it.

Regards,

92 posted on 06/29/2007 11:39:33 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson