Nope. I wouldn’t vote for Rudy at all (for other reasons)
Just pointing out that the research firm was the same that did a study which was clearly biased.
This is the firm: http://www.fabmac.com/staff.html
And their clients include the US Chamber of Commerce (who was a primary driving force behind the amnesty debacle)
I’m all for good data, but to be honest, a lot of the stuff these polling firms turn out is tailored to fit the goals of the folks who hire them. Just a friendly advisory to take all such data with a grain of salt.
Fair enough?
Clarification: The firm did ANOTHER study for a different group which was clearly biased.
Here are other polling companies that reached the same conclusions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1841238/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1856155/posts
Prehaps, but the poll result itself is like reporting that bears poop in the woods. We already knew a lot of Republicans are pro-life. What is that news?