To: goldstategop
So he ended up against it? Isn’t that what everyone wanted? He has said all along that he was only for it if it included certain things like border control. Since the version of the bill kept changing, I’m not sure Sam can be faulted. I’m not saying either way. I just don’t think this is enough info.
18 posted on
06/28/2007 2:48:23 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Apparently you weren’t following the live thread? When his name was called he voted Aye, and when it became apparent that the motion was going to fail, he changed his vote to Nay. It was blatant, it was obvious, and a lot of people were watching.
21 posted on
06/28/2007 3:12:13 PM PDT by
ichabod1
("Liberals read Karl Marx. Conservatives UNDERSTAND Karl Marx." Ronald Reagan)
To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
So he ended up against it? Isn’t that what everyone wanted? He has said all along that he was only for it if it included certain things like border control. Since the version of the bill kept changing, I’m not sure Sam can be faulted. I’m not saying either way. I just don’t think this is enough info.He's been a very long time supporter of open borders, and before he moved east, Jerry Agar interviewed Brownback and really took him to task for his views.
Mark
28 posted on
06/28/2007 6:07:38 PM PDT by
MarkL
(Listen, Strange women lyin' in ponds distributin' swords is no basis for a system of government)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson