Wow, lots of info. I scanned most of it but will read it in its entirety when I get home.
I received a transfusion in 1983, you can bet I and my Doctors were worried into the 90’s (they said 20 years and they’d feel safe saying I was free) about the possibility of HIV showing up (that and Hep C).
There’s so much quackery going on for medicine. A perfect example is Hulda Clark (not and MD but a Ph.D) who wrote a book called, “The Cure for all Cancers”. I wrote a response to a poster (whose name I forgot) who lived by her ‘teachings’. There’s no help for people like that. They think AIDS and Cancer are big conspiracies between MD’s and pharmaceutical companies. They seem to miss the parts where chemists and Doctor’s die of cancer as well. I guess they’re been sworn to never reveal the conspiracy...
==Wow, lots of info. I scanned most of it but will read it in its entirety when I get home....I received a transfusion in 1983, you can bet I and my Doctors were worried into the 90’s...about the possibility of HIV showing up...
Lx, I’m assuming you are at least interested in learning about both sides of the debate. Here’s a rebuttal to Ichneumon’s so-called “evidence” that HIV causes AIDS:
“The Evidence That HIV Causes AIDS”...is the most comprehensive document we know of to attempt to answer the many arguments that HIV does not cause AIDS. In the following REBUTTAL we argue that the NIAID/NIH document is seriously flawed for both failing to respect the standards of scientific discourse and failing to provide credible evidence to support its fundamental claims.”
http://www.healtoronto.com/nih/