Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts
According to his novel yet controversial "chromosomal" theory of cancer, which is receiving increased attention among cancer researchers, each cancer is unique, and there is no magic bullet.

Like hell he invented that concept, or that it's remotely controversial.

4 posted on 06/27/2007 11:08:54 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SteveMcKing

There is a differenct between “novel” and “invented”. Consult your dictionary.


9 posted on 06/27/2007 11:14:29 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SteveMcKing; CalGOPTom

http://biz.yahoo.com/pz/070416/117436.html


10 posted on 06/27/2007 11:16:54 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SteveMcKing
Like hell he invented that concept, or that it's remotely controversial.

Yes and No.

Duesberg should be credited with "rediscovering" the 100 year old concept that had been abandoned by the mainstream medical community. So no, he is not the inventor.

But yes, I believe his ideas are controversial for two reasons: 1) The chromosomal theory goes against 60 or 70 years of cancer theory and is not accepted by a large percentage of cancer researchers and 2) Duesberg is persona non grata in the medical community for his (correct IMHO) views on the non-relationship between HIV and AIDS.

My view: Duesberg is probably correct about this. He was right about AIDS and he is a scientist in the old tradition - the evidence is in the data and politics be damned.

47 posted on 06/28/2007 5:47:34 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson