Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

Remember that when we opposed the Miers SCOTUS nomination we were “sexist”. What do you expect from those clowns?


2 posted on 06/27/2007 2:33:36 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mathprof
When you opposed the Meirs nomination you probably did so believing a lot of erroneous and negative propaganda about the woman. She withdrew.

However, here you can read the bill itself and see that it contains Paragraph 902. NRO covered that part pretty well. The fact that it even exists suggests that the reason "W" is supporting the bill is to somehow exonerate his grandfather for being palsy-walsy with Germans in the 1930s. Teddy Kennedy, of course, seeks to exonerate his own father for doing so.

The people behind this bill have entirely too much psychosocial and personal emotional baggage to be involved in it.

They should withdraw.

You should also quit coming up with the Meirs nomination as instructive of anything whatsoever. The fact that she is NOT on the Supreme Court today is the reason the arch-fascist she-devil Ginzburg is still there. If Meirs had been on the court, Ginzburg would have retired by now and Judge Alito could be nominated. He could easily talk his way past a schmuck like Chuck Schumer. Whoever "W" nominates now can't.

3 posted on 06/27/2007 2:42:21 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mathprof

We should start insisting on mass deportations so these folks have something real to complain about.


10 posted on 06/27/2007 3:06:48 PM PDT by KEVLAR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson