The absurdity of your comment aside, do you think that referring to a scientist as a Church somehow belittles the scientist? If so, what does that say for all the non-scientific charlatans who create churches out of mythology?
==The absurdity of your comment aside, do you think that referring to a scientist as a Church somehow belittles the scientist? If so, what does that say for all the non-scientific charlatans who create churches out of mythology?
It’s enough for me that he admits that the Church of Darwin is in fact a religion. And thus, we must lump Darwinists in with the rest of the people you describe as charlatans. Am I correct to presume that you also include yourself in that description?