[Stultis]

I meant the neo-ID movement that was born out of Phil Johnson’s book, Darwin on Trial.

I read that book. It's full of typical creationist arguments. (No intermediate fossils, etc.) There's noting distinctively "ID" about it.

[GodGunsGuts]

==I read that book. It’s full of typical creationist arguments. (No intermediate fossils, etc.) There’s noting distinctively “ID” about it.

Actually, many Creationist arguments aren’t strictly creationist at all. They are simply arguments that falsify Darwin’s theory of evolution. Many of these arguments have been used by creationists, IDers and rival evolutionists alike.

[GodGunsGuts]

PS That doesn’t negate the fact that the modern ID movement found its genesis in Johnson’s books, meetings, and organizational efforts.