[t_skoz]

You put the least informative part of the article in the excerpt. It made no sense with the headline you posted.

Here is the preface from the website:

Denied access to his three children after his divorce, Mark was jailed for standing outside his house to wave to them. It took ten years and 133 hearings before they were reunited. How CAN the Government insist cases like his are kept secret?

[Cementjungle]

It sounds like he violated a no-contact order. It’s not clear why there was a no-contact order in the first place, so it’s hard to decipher what realy has been going on.

[Mr. Brightside]

You put the least informative part of the article in the excerpt. It made no sense with the headline you posted.

I hate it when they do that. Some people think that if they exerpt, that they MUST use the first few paragraphs, instead of the relevant ones.