Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima
O.K. I'm going to say this one more time. It's really very simple.

Bush does not enforce the borders because he does not want the borders enforced. He does not want the borders enforced because he does not believe that there should be borders, at least not between America and Mexico or Canada. He does not believe that America should have borders because he does not believe that America should exist as an independent soveriegn country. He does not believe that America should exist as an independent sovereign country because he believes in the New World Order/one world government/globalism .

Now what part of that explanation seems unclear or untrue to you?

Listen, your condescention is unnecessary besides being way off base. You don't have a line on believing Bush is pushing the NAU. I have stated this in post # 98 of this thread and many other threads. I've already responded to you about my post, and I'm not going to spend any more time parsing it.

609 posted on 06/28/2007 8:17:21 AM PDT by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]


To: Lijahsbubbe
Thank you for bumping my post. All modesty aside, that was really a well-written, well-reasoned explanation for why Bush does not enforce the borders, wasn't it?

But I am still interested in your opinion. Did any part of that explanation seem unclear or untrue to you? I would really value your feedback.

BTW, my vocabulary is obviously not as broad as yours. What is "condescention"?
610 posted on 06/28/2007 8:34:02 AM PDT by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson