Fascinating reconstruction of recent history.
Bush never cracked down on the border and it was never a major campaign argument for him.
It was not part of his agenda.
It is the border bots who are being disingenous. Why did you not kick him oout in 2004? It would have been easy to do. he traitorously refused to enforce our nations border for four years? Millions of illegals poured into the country from 2001 - 2004. Why did not the border bots go ballistic in 2004?
Did Bush really change his stripes in 2004 or did border bots just decide to fly into the convenient rage of the time?
Conservatism is on the rise so Buchannanites after 2004 decided it was time to return to their failed policies of the 1990s. The reactionary nativists of the 1990s fought NAFTA tooth and nail and lost. Now they want their payback.
Now we have to read extended reasons why Ron Paul is a good candidate when he is in fact an idiot.
This is going too far.
Reconstruction? Its a Restoration. What is a lie there?
“Bush never cracked down on the border and it was never a major campaign argument for him.
It was not part of his agenda.”
Uhh. You get elected President of the United States and millions of illegal aliens are pouring across your border, aided and abetted by a neighboring nation during a war against international terrorists and its not your business?
I agree the problem has been going on for some time and didn’t start with Bush, but it was EXACCERBATED by Bush and increased in intensity during his administration and despite the fact that this problem was brought to the fore by the media AND his base, he ignored it. More than ignoring it, he actively encouraged it.
“It is the border bots who are being disingenuous. Why did you not kick him out in 2004?”
With who? That idiot Kerry???
“Did Bush really change his stripes in 2004 or did border bots just decide to fly into the convenient rage of the time?”
Border bots?? How about just plain enraged Americans. It was only after 2004 that the extent of Bush’s damage on this front became apparent. It was only recently that his treachery and arrogance on Amnesty and his rent-a-slave program became manifest.
“Conservatism is on the rise so Buchannanites after 2004 decided it was time to return to their failed policies of the 1990s. The reactionary nativists of the 1990s fought NAFTA tooth and nail and lost. Now they want their payback.”
I’m not a atavist. I LIKE “immigrants”. Immigrants are good for America. But “immigrants” are NOT border sneaks, line jumpers, illegal invaders and illegal aliens. Legally naturalized Americans and legal resident aliens have just as much anger at this President and his policies as I do. Talk to some of them. NAFTA apparently FAILED.
If it worked, these Mexicans wouldn;t be pouring into America looking for jobs. Thanks to NAFTA, our good “friends” and trading “partners” the Red Chinese, will soon be importing cars into America - from Mexico.
“Now we have to read extended reasons why Ron Paul is a good candidate when he is in fact an idiot.”
I don’t agree with Paul on foreign policy. I’m not an isolationist. Unfortunately, isolationism is not possible in the modern world. But that doesn’t mean we have to surrender our borders, our language, our culture and our national identity so a bunch of globalist internationalists can make a bigger profit at the expense and safety of American citizens.