Posted on 06/26/2007 4:39:34 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Comparing Ann with Al Franken? Coopster, you want reasoned discourse but can’t understand that Coulter’s point of view already contains reason. It’s the discourse that mudies the waters of such wisdom. When met with nonsense from the left Ann and several others don’t give an inch, and that does amount to reason in the present poltical environment.
Ah, I see, when people don’t agree with you about Ann Coulter, we’re labeled “liberals.” Just another example of the trenchant wit that has prevailed here lately. Your statement ranks up with the other recent and overused FR gem, “Go back to DU!” Didn’t realize conservatism meant that you had to agree with every single point and adore every single commentator who shares your political worldview. In fact, I thought THAT was liberalism.
I forthwith will endeavor to follow her example.
What are you agreeing with?
Ann Coulter is too abrasive?
Just what the heck are you meaning, if you do not mind my asking? Please?
But when it comes to Ms Coulter I am totally behind her. For example, her faggot comment. It was meant to attack the un-American practice today of sending people for sensitivity training -- instead of that being the issue Ms Coulter became the "issue."
As far back as I can remember that's been the Left's tactics. "McCarthyism" a word coined by the CP/USA I believe became the "issue" and national security issues were ignored.
Limbaugh's parody of the LA Times' "magic Negro" and other parodies are ignored and Limbaugh becomes the "issue."
Ms Coulter was simply repeating a Bill Maher remark about our Vice President, Maher is not the "issue" but Ms Coulter is. Go figure. (Actually, I have figured. It's what the Left does: lie and distort. And as David Horowitz pointed out, for the Left the "issue" is not the issue. IMO that means that issues are weapons. THE issue is, bring it all down, man.)
Hey Chrissy, maybe Ann said Hillary has chubby legs because one can’t help but notice that fact when forced to look at them. There are a lot worse things one could say about the Beast. BTW, you have big, fat chubby cheeks and stubby little fingers.
As I typed that above...I realized that I am not only an idiot for not earlier considering the notion, I am also an idiot for not recognizing that only a woman could be so logically disabled.
As a woman, coopster should understand Ann more than the males. Ann speaks her mind, speaks it loudly and firmly, and gets attacked like a dog for her views. Then sticks to them! Ann Coulter is a Goddess, all hail Ann, and women should know the strength Ann has shown over the years.
She mopped the floor with that turd burglar!
Mathews is a liberal Democrat - didn;t he support some Dem for President some time ago?
Edwards’ wife is as much a prostituting phony sa her old man.
GET THEM ANN!!!!!
Edwards was so good at channeling babies, in fact, that he could tell exactly which ones were victims of malpractice. Despite the lack of any medical evidence suggesting that Caesarian deliveries lowered cerebral palsy, the Channeller was able to tell juries exactly which babies had been damaged as a result of vaginal delivery ? because he wouldn?t take a case knowing it to be baseless. I don?t believe a man who litigated against Edwards, who told the New York Times: ?He paints himself as a person who was serving the interests of the downtrodden, the widows and the little children. Actually, he was after the cases with the highest verdict potential.? That blasphemer!-Ben Shapiro
MOMMY!!!!!
Ok, now Ann is immoral. She stands up for people fighting a war, for your sake and mine, stands up for the unborn citizens, and so on. Yeah, immoral. Speaking her mind and holding her position, she’s a Christian Soldier and worthy of honor and not attacks on this site.
And there are plenty of people who stand up for soldiers, fight for the unborn, and are good christians that also do not spew negligent and venomous personal attacks on her opponents. This isn’t about her political views - it’s about the way she says them.
Ad hominem attacks are not intelligent attacks. She’s not an intelligent representative of the conservative movement. She’s an idiot.
It's impolite and probably a violation of the Treaty of Westphalia.
Ann's making her way. You make yours.
Coulter: "I don't have enough money."
Oooooh! Good one, Annie!!
He was in the tank for Kerry - and is doing everything he can for Obama and Hillary. He’s also a coward and a bully. If its still online go see Matthews attack on Michelle Malkin, he yelled and talked over her at every opportunity and turned her appearance on “Hardball” into a left-wing joke.
Ann, of course, is bigger and more aggressive so he couldn’t shut her down.
How Christian of you, calling Ann names and degredating her. For shame, my heaven sent emmisary. By the way, if Ann is an idiot, she’s a best selling idiot, and a leader of telling the truth where and when she sees it. What would Jesus say? Go Ann!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.