Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alter Kaker
Stingers come pretty close:

Light to carry and relatively easy to operate, the FIM-92 Stinger is a passive surface-to-air missile, shoulder-fired by a single operator, although officially it requires two. The FIM-92B can attack aircraft at a range of up to 15,700 feet (4800 m) and at altitudes between 600 and 12,500 feet

The Gremlin has a max range of 4500 meters, so that's not inconcievable. Since it was designed to hit combat aircraft, tracking a commercial jumbo would be childsplay.

The SA-18 Grouse has a max range of 16,000 feet. So there's another one.

You really should do just a teensy bit of research before you spout off that it's 'impossible'.

L

23 posted on 06/26/2007 9:18:41 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Lurker; Alter Kaker
Stingers come pretty close.

In Afghanistan, stingers were used well beyond their specified range for hitting slow-moving Soviet aircraft.

26 posted on 06/26/2007 9:30:41 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker
Stingers come pretty close:

No, they really don't. Stingers can't hit anything above 12,500 feet and they can't hit anything going anywhere near 500 mph. There's no way in hell that a Stinger -- or any MANPADS -- can come close to hitting a commercial airplane at speed and at altitude.

The Gremlin has a max range of 4500 meters, so that's not inconcievable

Yes, it is inconceivable. TWA 800 was at about 4500 meters when it exploded, so the Gremlin could have hit it... maybe... if it had been hovering like a helicopter and the person who was firing it was standing on dry land directly underneath. But at 500mph, there's no way it would have anything like the range needed to down the plane. Same goes for the SA-18. We're not talking about this being a little bit beyond the maximum capabilities of any of these missiles, this is far beyond their capabilities.

Moreover, all of them would have had to have been fired from boats 8 miles out into the ocean, not an easy task by any stretch. If you've ever tried to use a MANPADS, you'll understand what I'm talking about.

30 posted on 06/26/2007 9:46:57 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: Lurker

Yeah but it has a 35 lb warhead. That would have to be a really good hit on a fuel tank.

A large bomb onboard would be more effective.


51 posted on 06/26/2007 10:56:49 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson