Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redgirlinabluestate

Nor am I a ‘one-issue voter’, nonetheless I do feel that the 2nd, being the last check & balance against tyranny, is worth strong consideration. You do know what the redcoats were coming for, don’t you? In your state? Mitt’s drift towards rights may be less contrived than Rudy’s, but is no less obvious. He is doing it to get votes, not because that is what he believes. Geez even Kerry played “I am a hunter, honest I am” and everyone saw right through it.

I’ll opt for Fred Thompson over the rest of the field, thank you very much. Maybe Mitt can be Secretary of HUD or something.


40 posted on 06/26/2007 10:12:43 AM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: xDGx
That's fine, but since you brought it up, Fred is not perfect on the gun issue either. Good thing you are not a one issue voter, huh?

Smith “Anti-Brady” Amendment

On July 21, 1998, pro-gun Senator Bob Smith (R-NH) introduced an “Anti-Brady” amendment that passed by a vote of 69-31. The Smith amendment would prohibit the FBI from using Brady background checks to tax or register gun owners. Fred Thompson voted against this limitation of FBI registration of gun owners.

You should also check this:

http://gunowners.org/pres08/thompson2.htm

Guess who voted for the Domestic Confiscation gun ban?

I guess we'll have to remember what Ronald Reagan said: A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75

41 posted on 06/26/2007 10:31:46 AM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson