You made the statement:
The “facts” of evolution, however, come from an assortment of inaccurate date testing, hoaxes and outright lies.I called you on that statement. Don't you think you are under some obligation to support your statement?
For example, can you name five hoaxes in evolution? I'll give you a hint: Piltdown Man was a hoax. Now all you need is four! Are you up to it? There are 150 years of fossils, so from your statement it should be easy, right?
Find four more genuine hoaxes and we can go from there.
You are the one came here promoting evolution, the burden of proof is on you. I more than supported the need for competent science in the class room.
And if you want more hoaxes I’ll give you more than you asked for (keep in mind that this is only the beginning of the deceit of evolution): Neanderthal man, carbon 14 dating, sediment layers, dinosaurs and humans living in different time periods, Lucy.
One of the recent bird/dinosaur fossils was found to be
a hoax...even National Geographic magazine ran with it
for a while, then had to retract their statements. I
think this was in the late 90’s or early 2000’s.
Some of the drawings of Ernst Haeckel(sp?) in his famous series
of the embryological development of different species
were found to have been falsified. Even as early as 1972
my textbook on embryology recognized that the drawings
left much to be desired. I think one can remember the
phrase “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny”...I don’t
think that concept and it’s proof(the drawings) are taught
anymore, cause later research has shown that there are
great differences if the embryos of different species
at the same “stage”, and the drawings were glossed over
to make the theory of “orp” seem true.
Not that it really matters, but that’s a total of three
...can anyone remember any more off the top of their head?
NEBRASKA MAN: A SINGLE PIG TOOTH
OTA BENGA: THE AFRICAN NATIVE PUT INTO A CAGE
Archaeoraptor
Evolution is NOT observable,
Evolution is NOT testable; and,
Evolution is NOT repeatable.