Skip to comments.
Creationism makes a comeback in US
abc news ^
| Mon Jun 25, 2007 11:24am AEST
| Mark Simkin
Posted on 06/25/2007 5:55:14 PM PDT by Alien Syndrome
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-238 last
To: smug
"I will do as the holy spirit directs, the world is of indeterminable age." Unless you now want to change terms and argue absolute precision, that's not the Holy Spirit telling you the world is of indeterminable age.
You are confused and fear the ridicule of men.
To: GourmetDan; smug
Looks like our roles are reversed, because I think he did it just like it says in Genesis. In 6 24-hour days. You think God must have done it any way *except* the way he says he did in Genesis. And you claim the you 'believe the Bible as written'? Funny. Apparently you believe that smug "fears the ridicule of men", so you're going to ridicule him into line.
222
posted on
06/29/2007 7:35:45 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: BipolarBob
How many creationists don’t buy the “young earth” crapola?
Count me in!
223
posted on
06/29/2007 7:40:28 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: tacticalogic
You think that was ‘ridicule’?
Interesting...
To: GourmetDan
Rather intersting that you don’t seem to.
225
posted on
06/29/2007 10:41:20 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Not as intersting that you do seem to.
To: GourmetDan
Not as intersting that you do seem to.That makes what will follow too predictable to be of any interest at all.
227
posted on
06/29/2007 10:51:59 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic; GourmetDan; G Larry
Ridicule from anyone are not, I will hold to the belief that the days described in the account of creation are from the perspective of where the creator was. The time frame in heaven maybe 24 hours long for all we know, but it may not be and probably is not. Just as I hold that the bible tells two different stories of the creation on Man. One on the sixth day and Adam and Eve on the eight day or later.
228
posted on
06/29/2007 10:53:06 AM PDT
by
smug
(Free Ramos and Compean:)
To: tacticalogic
What preceded was too predictable to be of any interest at all. That’s why I reflected it back to you.
To: smug
Ridicule from anyone are not, I will hold to the belief that the days described in the account of creation are from the perspective of where the creator was. The time frame in heaven maybe 24 hours long for all we know, but it may not be and probably is not. Just as I hold that the bible tells two different stories of the creation on Man. One on the sixth day and Adam and Eve on the eight day or later.That's between you and God. Personally I'm inclined to hold a person's belief in and adherence to the Ten Commandments as a lot more relevant that their interpretation of Genesis.
230
posted on
06/29/2007 10:58:16 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: GourmetDan
What preceded was too predictable to be of any interest at all. That’s why I reflected it back to you.The fact of your reply belies the content.
231
posted on
06/29/2007 10:59:11 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: G Larry
How many creationists don’t buy the “young earth” crapola? I'm not going to stress over the age of the earth or universe or any other trivial matter. Sure it's fun to discuss and explore but it has no bearing on my faith in God or the Bible.
232
posted on
06/29/2007 11:00:08 AM PDT
by
BipolarBob
(Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rear view mirror.)
To: smug
"Ridicule from anyone are not, I will hold to the belief that the days described in the account of creation are from the perspective of where the creator was. The time frame in heaven maybe 24 hours long for all we know, but it may not be and probably is not." The account of creation is not written from the perspective of where the creator was. It was never intended to be understood as indeterminate until *man* decided that the earth cannot be 6,000 years old.
Then the compromisers started coming out and perverting the word of God to conform to the opinions of men.
How many millions of years were there between the third day when the plants were created and the fourth day when the sun was created?
"Just as I hold that the bible tells two different stories of the creation on Man. One on the sixth day and Adam and Eve on the eight day or later."
Then you have to invent a mass die-off so that Eve can eventually be the 'mother of all the living'.
Genesis 3:20 - "Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living."
That's what happens when you start perverting the word of God.
You can't stop.
To: tacticalogic
Not at all. It reveals it.
To: GourmetDan
If all you want is the last word, take it. It’s yours.
235
posted on
06/29/2007 11:08:15 AM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
If you wanted the last word, all you had to do is say so.
Go ahead.
To: GourmetDan
237
posted on
06/29/2007 3:11:49 PM PDT
by
smug
(Free Ramos and Compean:)
To: smug
Try believing what the Word of God says, not what you want it to say, and you’ll see who’s behind you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220, 221-238 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson