Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freekitty
I told you that I do understand it. Now, what does your experience have to do with the thread topic beyond trying to associate your anecdotal experience with a candidate who happens to share the religion of your villain? It serves no purpose here but to attempt attaching an ad hominum and guilt by association. Moreover, it is faulty thinking.

Then you compound that by accusing others of "moralizing" and when called on it, try to shut down the debate on it by claiming your public posings are none of other's business. Don't like being challenged on your words and actions? Tough.

100 posted on 06/26/2007 6:54:29 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird

The only mistake it seems I made was to say; please don’t flame me. That seems to be an invitation for attacks. For sharing some experiences I have had has turned into personal accusations that are very untrue. That’s unfair. I asked you questions and you can’t answer them. Instead, you attack. For that I am sorry.


101 posted on 06/26/2007 8:36:14 AM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson