To: neverdem
Excellent news. This will put a big dent in CFR and restore much more free speech. I think that it was wise of Roberts and Alito not to overturn the entire law just yet because it could set a precedent for judicial overreach in the future that we wouldn’t like. It’s often best to do these things incrementally and specific to the case at hand.
99 posted on
06/25/2007 12:54:28 PM PDT by
blitzgig
To: blitzgig
Excellent news. This will put a big dent in CFR and restore much more free speech. I think that it was wise of Roberts and Alito not to overturn the entire law just yet because it could set a precedent for judicial overreach in the future that we wouldnt like. Its often best to do these things incrementally and specific to the case at hand. LOL...
They're upholding something that is unconstitutional, which is bad no matter how you spin it.
101 posted on
06/25/2007 1:04:57 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
To: blitzgig
So, we're supposed to applaud as a long train of unconstitutional decisions are set up, and then bite the bullet later when those same decisions are cited as precedent. Argh...
103 posted on
06/25/2007 1:07:38 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson