Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ModelBreaker
The court did not have to decide the constitutionality of CFR as a whole. Only that it was unconstitutional as applied to the facts of this case. And issuing limited decisions in not bad judging.

It is when the Bill of Rights is clearly being trashed, and when their decision does nothing but further muddy the waters...waters that were already muddy enough because of the Court.

96 posted on 06/25/2007 12:26:43 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
It is when the Bill of Rights is clearly being trashed, and when their decision does nothing but further muddy the waters...waters that were already muddy enough because of the Court.

In the long term, a philisophy of deciding only what you have to decide to reach the decision is a proper judicial approach. I agree with you that some precedents from the past 40 years of excess (like McConnell) "just need killin'." They will be killed eventually. But the court is going to go at it one step at a time.

I am very pleased with this decision. Were we ever to get one more real conservative on the Court, this would go down as one of the great Supreme Courts in history.

107 posted on 06/25/2007 1:28:56 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson