But Roberts said, "Discussion of issues cannot be suppressed simply because the issues also may be pertinent in an election. Where the First Amendment is implicated, the tie goes to the speaker, not the censor."
I love this man!!!
21 posted on 06/25/2007 9:01:38 AM PDT by Lurking in Kansas
(Nothing witty here...)
Why? Roberts and Alito could have ruled the whole act unconstitutional (which it is), but refused to. Thomas, Scalia and Kennedy all wanted to do just that.
I am very skeptical of Bush's appointees.
40 posted on 06/25/2007 12:10:48 PM PDT by JeffAtlanta