Posted on 06/25/2007 7:26:04 AM PDT by kellynla
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Though the next president will probably command soldiers in two separate wars, few of those hoping to win the job can say they've ever seen combat or even taken abuse from a drill sergeant.
Of the 18 announced Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, only Republicans John McCain and Duncan Hunter have served on the front lines. Three others served in noncombat roles and another two served in the reserves.
Voters aren't likely to care very much, experts say.
"I just don't think we expect that obligation, and that's because we don't expect it of ourselves either," said Bruce Altschuler, a Vietnam veteran and political science professor at the State University of New York at Oswego.
That might allow voters and candidates to focus on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, said Ohio Wesleyan University history professor Michael Flamm.
"If no candidates in 2008 are running on or against their Vietnam records, perhaps we won't have to look at Iraq through the prism of Vietnam," he said. "Perhaps we will be able to look at the Iraq war as a new situation."
Between 1944 and 1992, military experience was seen as a must for presidents.
That ended when Democrat Bill Clinton, who never served in the military, defeated Republican President George H.W. Bush, a decorated World War II veteran. Four years later, Clinton defeated Bob Dole, another World War II combat veteran.
Republican George W. Bush, who spent the Vietnam years on U.S. soil as a member of the Air National Guard, defeated two Democratic candidates who served in Vietnam, Al Gore and John Kerry.
Experts say Americans' conflicted attitude toward the Vietnam War makes a military background less of an advantage.
That won't be a concern for many running in the November 2008 election.
DEFERMENTS, FLUNKED PHYSICALS
Republicans Sam Brownback and Mike Huckabee and Democrat Barack Obama had not yet turned 18 by the time the draft was discontinued in 1973.
Democrat John Edwards, who became eligible in the waning years of the war, drew a high lottery number that was not called when the lottery determined who would be inducted into military service.
College and missionary service kept Mitt Romney out of the draft until 1970, when he drew a high lottery number.
Rudy Giuliani also drew a high lottery number in 1970 after receiving deferments as a student and law clerk.
Democrats Bill Richardson, Joe Biden and Dennis Kucinich failed their physical examinations, as did Republican Tom Tancredo.
Republican Fred Thompson, who is expected to formally enter the race soon, received a deferment because he had children.
As a woman, Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton was not subject to the draft.
McCain's biography as a Navy airman who endured years of torture in a Hanoi prison is a central part of his appeal. Hunter, a decorated Vietnam War veteran, has made military issues central to his career in Congress.
Republican Jim Gilmore served in the Army in West Germany, while Ron Paul served as an Air Force surgeon. Democrat Mike Gravel served in the Army in the 1950s.
Democrat Chris Dodd joined the Army Reserve when he left the Peace Corps in 1968. Republican Tommy Thompson joined after law school in 1966.
The candidates' collective lack of military experience reflects the population as a whole.
Veterans accounted for 11 percent of the voting age population in 2000, according to the U.S. Census, down from 21 percent in 1970. By 2030, that figure will shrink to 6 percent, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
"Service in the military provides perspective on war, perspective on sacrifice," said University of Denver political -science professor Tom Knecht. "To the extent that we're losing that, that might be kind of a problem."
At the risk of opening up the whole conscription debate, it certainly provided some assimilating to many of the young men from first generation immigrant families. That is not happening now.
Plus, Israel seems to be better off with universal military obligation. Think of it as patriot training and self=defense enabling.
There, fixed it..........
Perhaps. Perhaps not. It certainly means lowered standards, reduced average physical ability, thousands of nondeployables and thousands more children to care for than the military had previously been responsible to care for.
Excellent point; apparently it didn't occur to Mitt, Rudy, Newt, Fred, etc. though.
Actually, if the primary were narrowed between Rudy and Duncan I think the better man would be evident.
“Democrats Bill Richardson, Joe Biden and Dennis Kucinich failed their physical examinations..”
Mental deferments?
Why the heck do you get off being a LAW CLERK as a deferment? WERE LAWYERS deferred?
For the liberals, it is all about being forced to serve. Volunteering is an alien concept I doubt they can deal with.
“That ended when Democrat Bill Clinton, who never served in the military was a draft dodger,
There, fixed it..........”
Thank you!
And a THREE-TIME DRAFT DODGER at that!
After America elected & reelected Klinton, I pretty much lost all respect for the American electorate.
I guess I saw too many dead Marines to ever legitimize the election of that POS, Clinton.
Could be but that , as you well know, won’t happen. Either Rudy, Fred or Mitt wins this and that is that. I will support the winner. Still, when Bob Beckel today says the race altogether is still a toss up, I am not so sure the Dems think they have this in the bag. Today, also, they started attacking Fred T.
Your military history must be impressive if you can make fun of a POW. Let's hear it.
I’d don’t put much stock in what Bob Beckel has to say. Go back to 1991 and see how he handicapped Bill Clinton. The republican nominee starts with 45% or so, unless he or she alienates great numbers within the party. Character issues will do that, among other things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.