Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/24/2007 9:37:08 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo
who he said don't know what is in the legislation but want to kill it nonetheless.

I've, in a cursory way, gone over every page of the amnesty for invaders bill. I wonder if Lott, or any other Senator, can say as much.

2 posted on 06/24/2007 9:43:26 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

[Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), one of the immigration bill’s chief architects, suggested on Sunday that opponents of the deal border on being racist.

“We’ve been down this road before — ‘no Catholics,’ ‘no Jews,’ ‘Irish need not apply,’ “ Graham said on ABC’s “This Week.”]

This little wimp is really starting to get on my nerves. C’mon people of South Carolina - you deserve better than this!


3 posted on 06/24/2007 9:44:56 PM PDT by 43north (I hope we are around long enough to become a layer in the rocks of the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

This immigration bill will prove to be an albatross around the neck of whomever is the GOP nominee. In an attempt to be more like the Democrats and attract the loyalty of the illegal invaders, the GOP will end up losing their base, not gaining any Democrat crossover votes and finding themselves not only losing Congressional seats but the White House as well.

And we all know what a Democrat victory in 2008 brings. It’s quite disheartening to see the mainstream GOP so totally ignore the voice of their base and support this turkey of a bill.


4 posted on 06/24/2007 9:45:04 PM PDT by The View From The Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
It was a casual shot across the bow, a shrugged comment last week from Senate Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-Miss.): Advocates of an immigration overhaul would have to "deal" with talk-radio hosts who he said don't know what is in the legislation but want to kill it nonetheless.

I keep hearing from Congresscritters that no one knows whats in such and such bill and no one understands this or that bill.

Why not propose legislation in plain English so that they could understand what they are voting on? Is that really too much to ask?

5 posted on 06/24/2007 9:45:34 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem."

I maintain that Lott did NOT say, "Talk radio is running America."; I believe he said, "Talk radio is ruining America." His dialect made the word "ruining" sound like "running".

6 posted on 06/24/2007 9:55:55 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
To The Washington Post, Lott had said, "I'm sure senators on both sides of the aisle are being pounded by these talk-radio people who don't even know what's in the bill." To the New York Times, he had offered: "Talk radio is running America. We have to deal with that problem."

Sounds to me like Lott wants to take the same approach to Talk Radio that Mc Stain took to non-candidate political advertising during election campaigns.

Perhaps it is time Lott faced forced retirement.

8 posted on 06/24/2007 9:58:19 PM PDT by Pontiac (Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
"Talk radio was sort of the watchdog on this," said Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.). "Who else was watching out? Who else was reading the bill?"

That’s Lott’s and Graham’s problem with Talk Radio they like it better when they can legislate with no one watching.

13 posted on 06/24/2007 10:02:59 PM PDT by Pontiac (Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
Advocates of an immigration overhaul would have to "deal" with talk-radio hosts who he said don't know what is in the legislation but want to kill it nonetheless.

That gave me concern but when I heard him say we were not going to intimidate a United States Senator, it really made me mad! He's got to go.

14 posted on 06/24/2007 10:08:33 PM PDT by NRA2BFree ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

A lot of stupid and nasty comments on there about people like us.


15 posted on 06/24/2007 10:09:28 PM PDT by Aria (NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

-—But the conservative response to Lott may be symptomatic of a broader disenchantment with the Republican Party-—

Hello! Hello! Is anyone there?


16 posted on 06/24/2007 10:09:39 PM PDT by claudiustg (I didn't leave the Republican Party. I was purged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
The return fire to that passing comment has been withering, as some of the nation's most prominent conservative talkers turn on a man they once defended adamantly.

There was a reason to defend Lott then. He was just saying something to bring a smile to the old guy on his 100th birthday. Remember the uproar? Remember how many times he apologized? Over and over and over again? Yes, he was defended by many (not just talk radio) over that, yet the dems still demanded his head on a platter and they GOT IT.

Now, it seems he's not the man we believed he was. Funny how that seems to be happening a great deal lately... His suckup to Feinstein today was pretty disgusting. Mr. Lott, when you kiss the a$$es of those who did their best to crucify you, and at the same time bash those who defended you, many of us are wondering....

What is your soul worth? Is it the highest bidder who decides?

25 posted on 06/24/2007 10:25:13 PM PDT by Just Lori (There is nothing "democratic" about Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

Wow - I haven’t seen the media this happy since ....well, ever...


30 posted on 06/24/2007 10:45:13 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

And .. the picture I get from these comments is that the WP is dancing in the ailes at their offices .. reveling in the pre-determined demise of the GOP.

The liberals always count their chickens before they hatch.


31 posted on 06/24/2007 10:49:29 PM PDT by CyberAnt (What is it about "ILLEGAL" that people don't understand ..??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
It's not for nothing that every street named after Trent Lott is One Way.
34 posted on 06/24/2007 11:07:35 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
As far as I’m concerned, the Republican party has just gone to warp 9 and hit a brick wall; they have all turned into democrats.

What this immigration amnesty bill has come down to, is two major political parties refusing to enforce the laws of the United States so they can pass a law that benefits both the parties but not the country of it’s citizens. THIS IS TREASON!

36 posted on 06/24/2007 11:18:28 PM PDT by Herakles (Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
I'm a conservative before I'm a Republican. My support of the Republican Party is not unconditional. If it turns its back on us, we won't be there when it needs us. That is, if the GOP elite are listening to conservatives.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

39 posted on 06/24/2007 11:53:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

97.3 here in Jackson is giving Lott hell and Lott hates it. I think that is why he made that anti-talk radio remark.

SHUT THE HELL UP LOTT, AND WORK FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS!

(And not the chicken farms that hire illegal aliens in Mississippi)


40 posted on 06/25/2007 12:03:51 AM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

Feinstein said on FoxNews sunday that she wants to reinstitute the fairness doctrine.


41 posted on 06/25/2007 1:37:59 AM PDT by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

“a man they once defended adamantly.”
As per usual the Washington Post is full of crap.
Talk radios support of Lott has been tepid at best.
Lott has been a weenie forever on conservative issues.
Like so many he puts his finger in the air and tests the way the wind blows before voting, having no true beliefs nor principles other then trying to make sure he gets re-elected.
He is an effeminate cheerleader.


45 posted on 06/25/2007 3:48:04 AM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson