Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just waiting to see who if any one of the Supremes will retire this summer...
1 posted on 06/24/2007 10:05:59 AM PDT by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kellynla

A race-based double-standard IS racism.


2 posted on 06/24/2007 10:08:02 AM PDT by Lexington Green (Paris Hilton did more time than Sandy Berger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

“Just waiting to see who if any one of the Supremes will retire this summer...”

IMO, another supreme court appointment is the only thing that could save gwB, it wouldn’t make everything “roses and butterflies” but it would make gwB look somewhat better to me at least.

Unless of course he renominates Harriet Myers.....:(


3 posted on 06/24/2007 10:14:50 AM PDT by padre35 (GWB chose Amnesty as his hill to die on, not Social Security reform.....that speaks much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

They are holding on for dear life, the ancient leftists; based on the notion that some rat infested white house will nominate their successors.

I forsee a mummy of a dead old liberal barnicle sitting in a chair for a yr.


5 posted on 06/24/2007 10:25:10 AM PDT by Weeedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla
If the Supreme Court finds that government is justified in using racial discrimination to accomplish schools with perfectly balanced racial populations, then that same government would be justified in controlling the communities from which those students come, with the same racial balances in mind.

Purchase of residential real estate could be regulated based on the purchaser's race. If the purchaser is a black person attempting to purchase in a black neighborhood, then why not disallow the purchase? Similarly, white people attempting to purchase in a neighborhood with an impermissible imbalance of white people, would then find their purchase disallowed. Such excess white people would be prohibited from buying anywhere except where white people are under-represented.

Then, of course, imbalances in retail clientele would need to be addressed. Racial identification would be done at the entrances to retail establishments. If an impermissible imbalance occurs, then only customers whose racial background accomplishes the correct balance would be allowed to enter.

Similar constraints on election of corporate CEOs, awarding of medical doctorates, and assignment of fire-fighters to battle fires would then follow. Eventually racial balances would be accomplished in every aspect of our lives.

Regulation of online dating services would of course have to include racially balanced dating. The eventual goal would be that racial differences should be eliminated altogether. This would be the "final solution".

9 posted on 06/24/2007 11:02:44 AM PDT by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kellynla

Let me help the court:

1. No, you can’t use race to decide where to send kids to school. “Equal protection” doesn’t mean bean-counting by race.

2. School-sponsored event??? You go to school, you follow the rules. Sorry, no banners allowed.

3. Taxpayers may certainly go to court. Let the Feds prove the spending is Constitutional.

4. Mr. Panetti, you’re mentally ill. Your victims are dead. I’m going with the victims on this one. Fry, Mr. Panetti.

That wasn’t hard...


10 posted on 06/24/2007 11:16:50 AM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson