A race-based double-standard IS racism.
“Just waiting to see who if any one of the Supremes will retire this summer...”
IMO, another supreme court appointment is the only thing that could save gwB, it wouldn’t make everything “roses and butterflies” but it would make gwB look somewhat better to me at least.
Unless of course he renominates Harriet Myers.....:(
They are holding on for dear life, the ancient leftists; based on the notion that some rat infested white house will nominate their successors.
I forsee a mummy of a dead old liberal barnicle sitting in a chair for a yr.
Purchase of residential real estate could be regulated based on the purchaser's race. If the purchaser is a black person attempting to purchase in a black neighborhood, then why not disallow the purchase? Similarly, white people attempting to purchase in a neighborhood with an impermissible imbalance of white people, would then find their purchase disallowed. Such excess white people would be prohibited from buying anywhere except where white people are under-represented.
Then, of course, imbalances in retail clientele would need to be addressed. Racial identification would be done at the entrances to retail establishments. If an impermissible imbalance occurs, then only customers whose racial background accomplishes the correct balance would be allowed to enter.
Similar constraints on election of corporate CEOs, awarding of medical doctorates, and assignment of fire-fighters to battle fires would then follow. Eventually racial balances would be accomplished in every aspect of our lives.
Regulation of online dating services would of course have to include racially balanced dating. The eventual goal would be that racial differences should be eliminated altogether. This would be the "final solution".
Let me help the court:
1. No, you can’t use race to decide where to send kids to school. “Equal protection” doesn’t mean bean-counting by race.
2. School-sponsored event??? You go to school, you follow the rules. Sorry, no banners allowed.
3. Taxpayers may certainly go to court. Let the Feds prove the spending is Constitutional.
4. Mr. Panetti, you’re mentally ill. Your victims are dead. I’m going with the victims on this one. Fry, Mr. Panetti.
That wasn’t hard...