I agree to some extent. Overall the exhibit was nifty, BUT...
I did get the sense that some of the bodies were being used more for art than education or science. Cadavers used for art? Hmmm. I’ll pass on that part.
While some of the bodies where aranged in a way that seemed more for artistic value than educational, I’d say that I felt the set-up was 80% educational, 20% “art”.
I honestly feel that I can be a better medic by being at the exhibit. I always that the impression that the arteries, even the aorta, were much larger. I would look at a portion and say “If a bullet hit you this way, what would be damaged” and could think about how I would treat somebody. Even the area with the baby fetus’s, you can see what appears to be a tiny face on something so small, and I think that even in a liberal place like Seattle, some people walked away just a little more pro-life.