All the pieces of the puzzle are becoming more prominent with each passing day of debate on this immigration shamnesty. The SPP , signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005 spells out the general framework in language that skirts around the whole issue of sovereignty. Bush has been working from the very beginning of his administration to implement this in stealthy piecemeal fashion, starting with his profound dereliction of duty at the border. The mass migration of illegals was Step One of his fait accomplis approach. Truly, does anyone really believe his pathetic excuses for why he can't do what even Mexico can and does do on its southern border?
His excuses are like a child's. Laughable and contradictory: "We can't figger out how to keep them out, and they're doing good work that Americans won't do. Plus, we can't seem to find them. They go home from work everyday and we don't know where they live. And when they come in to get their driver's licenses, we don't know where they then drive off to. Their kids at our schools won't tell us where their parents live, and gee...some of these poor unfortunate immigrants don't have their kids, or parents, or sisters and brothers with them here...and that's just terrible. Yeah, we need to fix all that...and the answer is Comprehensive Immigration Reform."
Step Two is this Bill, whereby in ratcheting form, this massive batch of illegals gets legalized - along with the right to bring up every Tomas, Ricardo, y Jorge in their family to share in the spoils. This was supposed to be snuck in by his fellow elitist backslappers, perfectly epitomized in this photo of RNC chairmen Martinez, Graham and Kennedy as they yukked it up after closed door sessions to sell out the US:
Well, Step Two didn't go as planned. It got stopped..slammed cold. So, did Bush accept that and wait for a perhaps more opportune time? No. Instead, he called from Europe to tell them to re-submit it, and now he is desperately trying to get it re-genned up, even in the face of waning support from the GOP and adamant opposition from the people of the US. Why now? What's the emergency, any more than there's been an emergency for the last 6.5 years? In order to understand that, we need to take a look at what Step Three is.
The next SPP summit will take place this August 21-22nd in Montebello, Quebec, and Bush wants to have this bill signed, sealed and delivered to present to this group as a huge step towards integration. After all, when half of Mexico is already here, what do we care if Mexico and the US merge? Plus, if Canada gets thrown in as part of the deal, it gives us all a place to run to when the US goes to absolute caca.
The larger question is why does Bush want to do this. I think he may be looking at several factors:
1. Rising and latently hostile powers all throughout the greater continent of Asia. Critical resources around the world are under the control of unstable and in many cases, hostile powers.
2. The US is running out of younger citizens, since they were being aborted or not being conceived at all.
3. To the North, there is Canada, chock full of resources, but no grunt labor to take advantage of it. To the South, a lot of oil and a basket case of cheap labor and draft age material, but all the industrial infrastructure is in the US.
I think Bush also knows that US citizens would never choose to give up sovereignty, so democracy?.. shme'mock'racy. He knows best, and he's gonna make it happen regardless of what we poor schlubs want. It's all for the best anyway, notwithstanding all the cultural destruction it entails, but none of his crowd will suffer any of those nasty but "necessary" consequences in any case.
Gotta love our own homegrown royalty.
Excellent, must read for anyone paying attention.
In theory this sounds like it could benefit our long term future, but in practice...well that’s another matter. So what is Mexico’s contribution to all this..gotta be more than just sending us their poor and getting a ton of $ sent back. Also, why would Canada be interested in this....they seem to be staying out of the fray - what would their incentive be? I hear the EU had various negative effects ...but the countries still have their individual governments...so far.....
And maybe this is a rhetorical question but why wouldn't’t they just tell us that this is the goal? At least it would be easier to take than the crappy explanations we’ve been fed so far.
Great essay at 141.
Esp. the mention of the SPP meeting in Quebec this summer.