[betty boop]

The threat comes from people wielding political power and attempting to replace science with bullshit.

Or alternatively, the threat could come from people wielding political/social power who wish to censor free scientific inquiry. It all depends on your point of view.

As you are an observer, you are entitled to see "bullshit," if that's the best interpretation of your experience WRT ID that you can come up with. That doesn't necessarily make the "conjecture" you impute to A-G bullshit WRT ID. For your observation is necessarily limited to what you observe. If your field of view is subjectively narrowed, you must experience it as limited by the restricted field of view you have chosen to allow. And your descriptions of it will be likewise narrow and partial (the latter in a double sense).

[unspun]

js you still seem to think the question of how the cosmos got to be what it is, to be a matter addressable fby the absurdity of science operable in a vacuum.

Or, maybe you're just afraid of the boogey men outside the windowshade.

[Alamo-Girl]

If your field of view is subjectively narrowed, you must experience it as limited by the restricted field of view you have chosen to allow. And your descriptions of it will be likewise narrow and partial (the latter in a double sense).

So very true. Thank you for your wonderful insights, dearest sister in Christ!