Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
Speaking of matter: Science hasn’t even defined what it is.

Are we supposed to?

291 posted on 06/29/2007 11:30:15 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale; Alamo-Girl; cornelis; narby; tacticalogic; js1138; hosepipe
Me: Speaking of matter: Science hasn’t even defined what it is.

You: "Are we supposed to?"

You would think that someone committed to the doctrine of materialism -- as many scientists are -- would have an interest in explicating the phenomenon on which the doctrine depends. A lack of curiosity here is, well, curious.

292 posted on 06/29/2007 11:37:30 AM PDT by betty boop ("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson