Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Whether it is unanswerable for you or not, there are only two possible answers. If that is too clear and distinct, we can hedge and fudge about what universe means and what that should include or exclude.

Scientific thinking has to assume the uniformity of natural causes, if not eternal, at least holding true for the very present. Scientific thinking makes metaphysical assumptions concerning time. It seems that the point that betty boop has just raised concerns the variable scope of our common ground as opposed to the full extent of reality. Like good lawyers, a scientist with an ounce of metaphysical sense has the opportunity to narrow the scope to make their preferred determinations.

198 posted on 06/28/2007 9:00:00 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]


To: cornelis
Whether it is unanswerable for you or not, there are only two possible answers.

That simply isn't true. the question is malformed. It is no more answerable by yes or no than My question to you: have you stopped having sex with your mother?

More is required of an answerable question than grammatical correctness.

210 posted on 06/28/2007 10:12:39 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson