So then there is no mindset that space/time is not expanding but revolving?.. or moving about in a finite/limited space?.. Galaxies moving away from each other need not be in an expanding enclosure.. (in my mind)..
Course I don't accept the BIG Bang.. An "explosion"(Big Bang) seems to be for me just so obvious of a human "observation".. as to how a whole darned universe began.. NOT to speak of the fact the Big Bang can be traced to vestiges of Hindu thought(CYCLES).. You know; that there has been "many" Big Bangs.. not just one of them.. Hinduism is such a lame excuse for a religion(theory of life) anyway..
So I presently am considering an infinite past.. the eternal past.. After all I can't get my mind around eternity anyway.. If eternity is even possible then, I am comfortable with I maybe cannot concieve of it practically.. with the tools I have at hand..
The BIG Bang is just so Hollywood..
Truly it doesn't bother me when a correspondent wishes to embrace a view which is mostly outside the mainstream of science. Science after all was originally part of philosophy/theology.
In that regard, the CMB measurements in the 1960's determined that the universe is expanding and thus, there was a beginning of real space and real time. That was the most theological statement ever made by science.