To: Tax-chick; bbruit
Not only that but I remember from a thread a few months ago that had a link from MERCK that said most womens bodies kill the virus on it’s own. They’ve created frightening hype in order to sell a dubious vaccine that won’t even protect against all the viruses. For money.
81 posted on
06/23/2007 1:26:21 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
To: DJ MacWoW
There are a lot of potential bad outcomes here. If the vaccine is still on the market when my daughters are adults, then they will have the opportunity to use it. However, we’re not interested in being “testers.”
83 posted on
06/23/2007 1:31:29 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Not only that but I remember from a thread a few months ago that had a link from MERCK that said most womens bodies kill the virus on its own. Theyve created frightening hype in order to sell a dubious vaccine that wont even protect against all the viruses. For money.
- These viruses are eventually cleared from the body as active infections, but they are retroviruses and insert themselves into your cells' DNA. This genetic damage is what is responsible for the later development of cervical cancer. Someone who has been vaccinated will mount an immediate immune response to the virus to eliminate it before many cells are infected. This will prevent the genetic damage that leads to cancer.
- It protects against the major types of HPV that cause cervical cancer. It really doesn't need to protect against them all.
119 posted on
06/24/2007 12:11:12 PM PDT by
ahayes
("Impenetrability! That's what I say!")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson