[DJ MacWoW]

No they're not. The vaccine could prevent probably 65% of cases of cervical cancer.

The CDC disagrees with you. Cervical cancer is an uncommon consequence of HPV in women.

Which does not change the fact that the vaccine has been studied in children.

1000 is SO many! /sarc

What's the arbitrary point at which you will allow marketing of a vaccine?

Again, my objection is fooling women into believing that Cervical cancer is widespread, it's caused by HPV and that Gardasil is a CANCER vaccine.

I am done with you.

[ahayes]

The CDC disagrees with you. Cervical cancer is an uncommon consequence of HPV in women.

Your logic circuits are broken.

1. HPV infection is necessary for cervical cancer to develop.
2. This vaccine is 95% effective at preventing infection by the HPV strains that cause 70% of cervical cancers.
3. Ergo, using basic math, if women used this vaccine, over 65% of these cases of cancer could be prevented.

How does the CDC disagree with any of these facts?

Again, my objection is fooling women into believing that Cervical cancer is widespread, it's caused by HPV and that Gardasil is a CANCER vaccine.

I saw a Gardasil ad on tv last night and it said thousands of woman are diagnosed with cervical cancer every year. This is true, and it's even more than 10,000. How is that a lie?

HPV is the sole cause of cervical cancer. How is that a lie?

Preventing HPV therefore will prevent cases of cervical cancer. How is that a lie?

I am done with you.

I am done with you. While I can be excessively patient in explaining things to people, when dealing with someone whose agenda for some reason requires repeatedly denying basic facts I eventually lose my patience.