LOL. I've got a big problem with the state making it mandatory. If parents want to get for their kids in private commerce, more power to them.
Then again, if a Bible-thumper's daughter ends up with an STD-related cancer, I'm sure there are a few passages of scripture that can be quoted..."wages of sin are death," etc. Few things are more absurd than interpreting holy books to promote death and disease as the will of God. The flip side of the "touchdown Jesus" coin. Same alternative reality that believes the harder one thumps a Bible, the less likely it is a child will have sex before 18.
It’s nice to see I have at least one kindred spirit on here. I’m sure we’ll both be banned shortly.
I don’t quite understand your posts but that’s ok. This is just common sense. You don’t give a prepubescent girl a drug that isn’t proven safe for the age group. What affect will it have on reproduction? They don’t know. Is one shot enough? They don’t know. My kid isn’t a guinea pig or a goldmine for Merck.
Well, since this particular dad has obviously taught his daughter that this particular STD can cause cancer, perhaps she will be one of those who actually keeps herself pure until marriage.
In the meantime, parents are being lead down the primrose path by this pharmaceutical company, making them believe this vaccine will prevent cervical cancer (which it won't.)
I find your phraseology quite offensive.
What a completely stupid and ignorant thing to say. You should be proud of yourself.