Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High School Sports Recruiting Limited (by Supreme Court)
Las Vegas Sun ^ | 21 Jun | Mark Sherman

Posted on 06/23/2007 6:25:35 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: xzins

Why don’t you re-read what my question is and then think about what I am asking.


21 posted on 06/23/2007 1:15:07 PM PDT by miele man (Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
When the SCOTUS is asked to hear a case (petition for a writ of certiorari) 4 Justices must vote in favor of hearing the case in order for it to get before the Court. The Chief Justice gets only 1 vote.

As for this decision, I agree that if join an organization then you agree to abide by its rules. I believe that next term, the SCOTUS will hear where the school involved is not a member of the sport association involved, but that association is attempting to enforce its recruitment rules against that school. The association's reasoning is that the school is within the association's geographical jurisdiction and so is bound by the association's recruitment rules.

22 posted on 06/23/2007 9:08:24 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 ($5,000 for a piece of American Sovereignty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: miele man

You are a prospective student until the time you are actually a student.


23 posted on 06/24/2007 7:55:49 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Well, I suppose this is analagous to the definition of “is”.

If one has signed a contract to enter a school, then in my mind you are legally a “student and not a “prospective” recruit”. The “intention” is obvious. I suppose the justices hold a different view as do you. Still, my beef here is the fact that the school’s coach sent letters to student’s already in the system, not some student outside of the school.


24 posted on 06/24/2007 8:05:50 PM PDT by miele man (Continually voting against iodine deficient libs for 42 years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: miele man

Since it’s high school, there is no preventing anyone from changing their minds. Actually, I think it’s the same with college....even when the prospect has signed a letter of intent. With high school, there is absolutely nothing binding a student to attend a particular school.


25 posted on 06/25/2007 4:14:02 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kay Ludlow

So what is your feeling in the case of the NCAA trying to force schools like Florida State to stop using native American mascots? Are those schools grandfathered in, or should they have to either abide by the rule or join a new association?


26 posted on 06/25/2007 4:19:21 AM PDT by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightFighter
They should follow the new rules or form a new association UNLESS they are required by some law to be a member of the organization. If they are compelled to be to be a member, allowing them to be grandfathered would be equitable.
27 posted on 06/25/2007 3:24:10 PM PDT by Kay Ludlow (Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: xzins

government schools couldn’t compete so they ran to the courts. Typical.


28 posted on 06/25/2007 3:26:12 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3

I disagree. I think they just expected everyone to follow the rules.


29 posted on 06/25/2007 9:00:11 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I guess the supremes don’t enough to do.


30 posted on 06/25/2007 9:01:10 PM PDT by herMANroberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: herMANroberts

I do agree witht that. I’m still not sure why they would take a case like this.


31 posted on 06/25/2007 9:06:15 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson