Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
Why would they hold it unconstitutional? The constitution itself in the fourteenth amendment defines a citizen:

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

If the parents are not subject to the juristiction of the US then their child born here is not a subject (citizen).

The law was written to protect black slaves not create a backdoor for illegals to gain citizenship.

150 posted on 06/22/2007 11:46:47 AM PDT by Waryone (The Ted Kennedy wing of the Republican Party needs to be defeated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Waryone

“The law was written to protect black slaves not create a backdoor for illegals to gain citizenship.”

Precisely! And that’s clearly shown by the legislative history.
If the Supremes find/found that the legislators meant to grant automatic citizenship to any person born within our boundaries, by mere birth, then they’ve simply found another `penumbral’ right.

In any event, isn’t a SCOTUS that simply rules upon law, and does not make law, what so many of us worked so hard for to see realized?


159 posted on 06/22/2007 12:14:24 PM PDT by tumblindice (The law is what is forcefully presented and plausibly maintained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson