Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
I cite the law because it provides an indication that the congress believed that such a law was necessary to clarify the point.

No you haven't. In seven years of observing discussions of anchor babies on FR I've never seen such a citation. USC Title, Chapter, Section, and line number, please.

I have not examined your 14th amendment argument, but I do believe that the Congress has the power to deny citizenship to anchor babies under the 15th.

Until you have I won't respond.

146 posted on 06/22/2007 11:27:38 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie

Not worth the time. Sorry. Amateur constitutional scholars make so many silly mistakes that it just wastes all day trying to help them, and I don’t have the time. Good luck with that 14th amendment argument, though, and I hope you prevail on your IRS tax protest, too—the tax code is unconstitutional, too, doncha know.


148 posted on 06/22/2007 11:32:35 AM PDT by Defiant (W '04...........Cheney '07, Thompson/Hunter '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson