Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 3AngelaD

It may be a spectacularly GOOD idea, just for that reason.
For the agency to divulge anything of consequence(this has happened before) signals a conscious effort to sanitize itself, “come clean” , PRECISELY to head off and pre-empt
anticipated pressure to do just that from its internal enemies.
THAT, plus, perhaps a signal of a new shift within the Agency itself into a less “reckless”, more State Department type of worldview. If that’s what it is, that’s what you should be worrying about, not giving fodder to “America-haters”.


13 posted on 06/22/2007 7:05:58 AM PDT by supremedoctrine (The only thing sourdough bread is good for is a grilled cheese sandwich.For that, it's essential.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: supremedoctrine

After seeing the film Breach and reading about Robert Hanssen, who knows just how “accurate” these reports are.


19 posted on 06/22/2007 7:29:25 AM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: supremedoctrine

Oh, please. Shall we all sing Kumbaya for the new State Department, less reckless world view? There, now, feel better? If they had followed the course you advocate, Chile would be a big, fat Cuba in the middle of South America. I think the CIA should keep it secrets to itself, STFU and do something about Hugo Chavez. And I don’t want to know the details.


23 posted on 06/22/2007 12:22:17 PM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson