Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
But the agency failed to explain that 80 percent of the air samples were taken after the apartments had already been cleaned.

When you are doing asbestos clean-ups, you take a few samples during the work, but you take a lot of samples when the work is complete to verify that it is safe to reoccupy the space.

The workers are protected during the work by their Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), so the levels during the work are not that important. The samples taken during this time are really to make sure they are using the right PPE.

I am not saying the government did everything right, here. But the fact that 80% of the samples were taken after the clean-ups were complete is appropriate and exactly as it should have been done.

2 posted on 06/22/2007 3:23:53 AM PDT by gridlock (WAR IS PEACE / FREEDOM IS SLAVERY / DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gridlock

And some public servant threw all that data into an Osterizer and blipped out an irrelevant number to the public. Or else some dummy newsperson grabbed the wrong figure off of a gummint website. It would be interesting to see just where the slip happened between the cup and the lip.


3 posted on 06/22/2007 3:29:02 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson