Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland
The depositions should indeed be very interesting. We are getting closer. It is easy to misspeak, and we all occasionally do that. It is less easy to make an error while writing. When you swear to a declaration, however, there is no room for misspeaking or making an error.

One would think so. However, I've been following Mark Steyn's commentaries on the Conrad Black trial in Chicago (Patrick Fitzgerald prosecuting), and it appears that Fitz and team are strenuously arguing for some wiggle room in numerous sworn documents in that case, and have a better than even chance of winning, according to Steyn.

My understanding of that case is less than complete, and the two situations may not be the same, as well.
14 posted on 06/21/2007 8:40:55 PM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: caveat emptor

In this case, Hillary very clearly said the event was for her Senate campaign. It indeed was. The donor intended that. Hillary has finally been caught telling the truth.


15 posted on 06/21/2007 8:45:33 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson