THE PLANE WAS CHARTERED EITHER BY THE SAUDI ARABIAN ROYAL FAMILY OR OSAMA BIN LADEN
And JW uses phrases like "probably". So it is pure speculation on the part of JW. It has been widely reported that those planes carried Bin Laden family members who had no contact with Osama, but were scared of retaliation because of their last name, so I am sure that the last name of Bin Laden probably did show up on the charter records. I can't find the info now, but I remember reading that one of the Saudi Princes was the one that initiated these flights and that no one in the Administration above Richard Clarke was aware of them at the time, Clarke admitted that. Finally, IMHO, JW hasn't had any credibility in a long time.
Does your definition on credibility change with what the individual is working on. This information was in the report, he was honest enough to place both options in the title of the article. How does that lack credibility? When he attacked Hillary and Bill for their wrongdoing he had alot of credibility but when he finds something that was hidden, that should be displayed and discussed, he now lacks credibility.
It seems that the word credibility is the loser in this exchange. Diluting the word because of an emotional response does not change the fact that the terms either OBL or Saudi were used in the report released by the Freedom of Information Act and that they themselve had to go to court to remove redaction.