Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SShultz460

So far as I know, new destroyers may be slower than WW2 counterparts. I believe Fletcher Class DDs were capable of speeds as high as 35 to 38 knots. I am correct on that?

I love aircraft carriers, but if they are attacked by waves of cruise missiles launched from a long way out, how would one evade and survive?

Interesting post, thanks.


5 posted on 06/21/2007 7:42:43 AM PDT by RexBeach (Americans never quit. -Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RexBeach

Seawolf class challenges that speed, I won’t go further


10 posted on 06/21/2007 7:45:45 AM PDT by SShultz460
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach
I love aircraft carriers, but if they are attacked by waves of cruise missiles launched from a long way out, how would one evade and survive?

Carriers do not travel alone. There is a lot of interlocking firepower available to sweep the skies free of missiles.

Carriers can also launch a counter attack to the missile launch sites, without crossing over the nuclear threshold.

Of course once an opponent crosses that threshold, all bets are off...

28 posted on 06/21/2007 7:53:38 AM PDT by null and void (Tired of living in the shadows? Move to Sunny Mexico!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach
So far as I know, new destroyers may be slower than WW2 counterparts. I believe Fletcher Class DDs were capable of speeds as high as 35 to 38 knots. I am correct on that?

They are slower, but they're better sea boats and more capable. And if you've got a missile chasing you then the fact that you only do 32 knots instead of 38 isn't going to matter much.

36 posted on 06/21/2007 7:58:04 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach

Anyone remember “ The Bedford Incident” - great movie.

When subs are high value enough, there’s always the nuclear depth charge. ( Close counts with horse shoes, hand grenades and nuclear depth charges).


56 posted on 06/21/2007 8:36:42 AM PDT by Waverunner ( "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: RexBeach
I think the layered defense argument for the CVNs is absurd.

The benefits of overwhelming the defenses with cheap missiles so far outweighs the costs that someone, somewhere, someday will find it in their interests to try.

83 posted on 06/21/2007 11:20:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Trails of troubles, roads of battle, paths of victory we shall walk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson