*************
Who knew this was to become a ZOT thread?
Welcome to Free Republic, TheBridge.
Posted on 06/20/2007 11:12:04 PM PDT by Politicalmom
Hillary and her “soulless minions”? I stopped reading right there. Objectivity out the window. Typical WND.
*CLICK*
I’m not a Rudy supporter either. I like Mitt and Fred.
Say, do you suppose the Clintons have access to any kryptonite???
I didn't know that a person had to announce 2 years in advance to run? You did have it partially right, A vote FOR Rudy is like a vote FOR Klintoon! Gun grabbing, gay loving NY lib. Gee do I choose Rudy or Hillary???
Is there an objective statement in there somewhere?
Cordially,
Tooty Fruity Rudy isn’t making it out of the primaries.
AMEN a thousand times.
Imagine that, strategery lost on a julie-annie supporter.
While I love re-reading the history, that committee was one of the key opportunities lost thanks in part to Fred not being able to bring it to its conclusion. Why? Because John Glenn, minority leader on the committee, frustrated the whole process. Why? Because Clinton had promised Glenn that he would cover long overdue campaign debts going back to 1984 and he would give John Glenn one last ride on the NASA Shuttle.
Fred was was too nice — as this article points out: the corruption was there for all to see but Fred didn’t have the b**** to press it.
I like Fred, but this was far from his best moment in the Senate.
*************
Who knew this was to become a ZOT thread?
Welcome to Free Republic, TheBridge.
Did I just hear a bug zapper click on?
}:-)4
He wasn't given the tools to press it, because Glenn blocked the necessary grants of immunity to key witnesses. In fact, the hearings were quite successful, as many of the key figures were eventually brought up on various charges, but the Democrats on the committee made sure the Clintons got off the hook.
If Thompson made a mistake, it was early on, based on his Watergate experience, in assuming that both parties would lay aside partisan differences in order to root out corruption in their ranks. He was unprepared for the "party over principle" attitude the Democrats developed in the 20 or so years between the events. I doubt he'll make that mistake again.
Anyone who hasn’t read Ann Coulter’s book “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” should do so as a refresher course to the crimes of selling of America by the Clinton administration during the 1990’s. The fact that so many still sit in Congress today, who are aware of the magnitude of these crimes and who have said and done nothing- spelled the beginning of the end of life as we knew it.
Aside from personally always being a bit suspect of World Nut Daily, I think this article is pretty much right.
No such animal as a fair fight, particularly with this generation of Dems.
We know all that stuff about the Clintons. None of this is any sort of secret. What makes anyone here think these facts, true and damning as they are, will get any traction? No one besides us even gives a hoot. Or for that matter, will they even be brought up by our side?
WND makes a good case on paper, but in the real world?
If you think that the Republican Party is JUST NOT LIBERAL ENOUGH,,,,
and to want to accelerate that movement much further to the LEFT,,,,
a liberal like JulieAnnie is JUST THE MAN FOR THE JOB!!
It's amazing how many 'so called' conservatives are willing to 'toss the conservative base and its traditional conservative values and principles' overboard to elect a liberal like JulieAnnie--in the name of the WOT.
It's even more outrageous and ludicruous to think (as many of them must do) that JulieAnnie is the only Republican who will aggressively fight the WOT. That is ridiculous--absolutely ridiculous.
Once again for good measure, liberal Republicans like JulieAnnie are MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than liberal democrats,,,
because liberal Republicans BLUR THE DISTINCTION between conservatism and liberalism,,,,
making LIBERALISM MUCH MOFE ACCEPTABLE!!
“Fred is very knowledgeable about the Clintons’ dealings with China.”, “the candidate with the most knowledge about the Clintons is Huckabee.” ............ Doesn’t knowing and not doing anything about it make it worthless? Clinton backers have tunnel vision and closed minds, it won’t phase them a bit. You can make all the allegations you want, the Clintons are untouchable. They’ll get a free pass or a light slap on the wrist. Besides you’ll never get the couch sitting, twinky eating, Jerry Springer - Maury watchers or Jay walking types to vote for anyone other than the Clintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.