Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Golden Eagle
Google and IBM are who’s trying to push everything back up to the cloud. Microsoft made it’s fortune with a distributed architechture and will mostly stay there unless open source destroys the ability to make money on the desktop and forces them up the stack, which I doubt. Pure open source is actually waning right now and Apple is the hot new topic.

Cloud jargon notwithstanding, MS knows very well that individuals and particularly businesses will not continue to purchase upgrades they don't need at ridiculous prices (as they are experiencing with Office 2007),even though they are pressuring them to do so through extremely complicated licensing schemes like "Software Assurance" that even MS's own licensing experts have difficulty understanding.

When MS said it was "betting the company on dotnet" it was referring to a strategy of "... it would essentially transform the heart of its revenue base from packaged software to subscriber-paid ''interactive services.'"

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A01E7DE1730F936A15755C0A9669C8B63

62 posted on 06/21/2007 4:42:37 AM PDT by Northern Alliance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Northern Alliance

LOL your link is not only to the NYT, it’s seven years old! Microsoft still sells directly off the shelf at brick and mortar stores, they’re not changing anything until they have to meanwhile these open source cloners can’t even reach 5% giving away free downloads from the comfort of your couch.


63 posted on 06/21/2007 5:22:51 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson